ContractRisk.io
Services AgreementSample review

5.7

/ 10 risk

Vendor Services Agreement

Client ↔ Brightpath Consulting LLC · Governing law: United States

⚖️ Verdict: Proceed only with key changesLeans: Favors the vendor (Brightpath)

A consulting agreement with two real imbalances: the vendor keeps ownership of the deliverables you paid to create, and the indemnity runs entirely one way. Both are squarely negotiable.

6

Clauses analyzed

2

High risk

2

Need review

2

Accepted

↓ Download PDF↓ Download WordAll samplesScan your own — free →

Where to focus

Your top negotiation priorities

The flagged clauses ranked by how much they matter. Tackle these first — tap any one to jump to the full breakdown and the suggested safer rewrite.

1

Intellectual Property Ownership

Intellectual PropertyHIGH RISK

Retaining IP in custom deliverables the Client funded is a major imbalance, made worse by the license being revocable. This is the top item to negotiate.

Jump →
2

Indemnification (Broad, One-Sided)

IndemnificationHIGH RISK

An indemnity that covers the vendor's own ordinary negligence is heavily one-sided. Make it mutual and limit each party's indemnity to claims arising from its own acts, IP infringement, and breach.

Jump →
3

Payment Terms (Net-60)

PaymentNEEDS REVIEW

Net-60 is workable; negotiate a short grace period before interest accrues and confirm interest applies only to undisputed amounts (it does, which is good).

Jump →

Shared contract report

Clause risk overview

Enterprise-grade contract risk intelligence.

Scan your own contract — free →

Overall risk

NEEDS REVIEWScore: 5.7/106 clauses
High: 2Medium: 2Accepted: 2

Benchmark delta

+0.7

Industry benchmark

5/10

Compound risks

0

Heatmap high

2

Risk heatmap

High
33%
Medium
33%
Accepted
33%

Intellectual Property Ownership

Intellectual PropertyScore 9/10Priority 10/10
HIGH RISK
SeverityOverall 9/10
Financial
8.0
Legal
9.0
Ops
7.0
LegalFinancial
  • Brightpath retains ownership of all deliverables and grants the Client only a non-exclusive, revocable license.
  • For bespoke, paid-for work product, clients typically expect ownership or at least an irrevocable, perpetual license.
Risk insight: Retaining IP in custom deliverables the Client funded is a major imbalance, made worse by the license being revocable. This is the top item to negotiate.
Safer rewrite: Deliverables created specifically for the Client under an SOW shall be 'work made for hire' and, to the extent they do not so qualify, Brightpath hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such deliverables to the Client. Brightpath may retain ownership of pre-existing and general tools, granting the Client a perpetual, irrevocable license to any such materials embedded in the deliverables.
Law ref: 17 U.S.C. §101 (work made for hire)
Worst case: After the engagement, the Client cannot modify or migrate its own bespoke deliverables, and the vendor revokes the license during a fee dispute.

Indemnification (Broad, One-Sided)

IndemnificationScore 8/10Priority 10/10
HIGH RISK
SeverityOverall 8/10
Financial
8.0
Legal
9.0
Ops
5.0
LegalFinancial

The Client must indemnify Brightpath for claims arising from the engagement 'regardless of the cause,' carving out only the vendor's gross negligence or willful misconduct — leaving the Client on the hook for the vendor's ordinary negligence.

Risk insight: An indemnity that covers the vendor's own ordinary negligence is heavily one-sided. Make it mutual and limit each party's indemnity to claims arising from its own acts, IP infringement, and breach.
Safer rewrite: Each party shall indemnify the other against third-party claims arising from the indemnifying party's negligence, willful misconduct, breach of this Agreement, or infringement of third-party intellectual-property rights. Neither party indemnifies the other for the other party's own negligence.
Law ref: Restatement (Second) of Contracts §90
Worst case: A deliverable defect caused by the vendor's negligence triggers a third-party claim, yet the Client must defend and indemnify the vendor.

Payment Terms (Net-60)

PaymentScore 5/10Priority 6/10
NEEDS REVIEW
SeverityOverall 5/10
Financial
6.0
Legal
3.0
Ops
4.0
Financial
  • Invoices are due in 60 days with 1.5% monthly interest on undisputed late amounts.
  • Net-60 is acceptable, but the interest rate is on the higher side and there is no grace period before interest accrues.
Risk insight: Net-60 is workable; negotiate a short grace period before interest accrues and confirm interest applies only to undisputed amounts (it does, which is good).
Safer rewrite: Undisputed amounts not paid within ten (10) days after the due date shall accrue interest at 1.0% per month or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is less.

Limited Warranty & 10-Day Notice

WarrantyScore 5/10Priority 7/10
NEEDS REVIEW
SeverityOverall 5/10
Financial
4.0
Legal
5.0
Ops
6.0
OperationalLegal

Brightpath warrants workmanlike performance, but the Client's only remedy is re-performance and the Client must give written notice within 10 days of the deficient performance — a tight window that may lapse before defects surface.

Risk insight: The workmanlike-performance warranty is fine; the 10-day notice window is too short. Extend it to 30 days from discovery and preserve termination as a remedy if re-performance fails.
Safer rewrite: The Client shall notify Brightpath of deficient Services within thirty (30) days of discovery. If Brightpath fails to re-perform the Services to conform to the warranty within a reasonable period, the Client may terminate the affected SOW and receive a refund of fees paid for the deficient Services.

Termination for Convenience

Term & TerminationScore 3/10Priority 4/10
ACCEPTED
SeverityOverall 3/10
Financial
3.0
Legal
2.0
Ops
3.0
Operational
  • Either party may terminate for convenience on 30 days' notice, with payment for services performed through termination.
  • This is a balanced, mutual exit right.
Risk insight: Mutual 30-day termination for convenience with payment for work performed. Balanced and customary — no changes needed.

Insurance Requirements

InsuranceScore 2/10Priority 3/10
ACCEPTED
SeverityOverall 2/10
Financial
2.0
Legal
2.0
Ops
1.0
Financial
  • Brightpath carries $1M general liability and $2M professional liability (E&O) and will provide certificates on request.
  • These are reasonable coverage levels for a professional-services vendor.
Risk insight: Adequate insurance coverage and proof-of-coverage mechanism. Consider requiring the Client be named as additional insured, but no substantive concern.

Want this for your own contracts?

Get the full clause-by-clause breakdown, suggested rewrites, law references, and a redlined Word doc — free to start.

Start free →